Page 32 - The Beauty and Sorrow in Endodontics-Chapter 1
P. 32

drainage occurred as soon as the pulp chamber was opened, and the patient
                       reported instant relief of pressure. Obtained patency in each canal with

                       copious ultrasonic irrigation of NaOCl. Intracanal medication with NaOCl,
                       cotton pellets and a bilayer temp restoration (Cavit + composite resin)
                       placed (Fig 19C).

                       Rx: Clindamycin 300mg BID for 7 days

                       Appt 2: Temporary restoration removed with high speed until a thin layer

                       left, then a DG-16 endo explorer was used to puncture a hole in the material
                       followed by removal with a spoon excavator. Proper cleaning and shaping to
                       the proposed taper in each canal completed.  The cone fit radiograph
                                                                        1
                       showed good canal shaping and fit of the master cones (Fig 19D). After final
                       ultrasonic irrigation with QMix, the canals were dried with paper points.
                       Warm vertical compaction (down pack + back fill) obturation completed

                       along with a core placement. The radiograph shows good obturation depth
                       and density, and the extruded sealers at the exit of each canal represent tight
                       apical seal (Fig 19E). The flow and taper of the obturated canals match their
                       corresponding root shape following the natural curvature of the original

                       canals (Fig 19F). The only disappointment was that no lateral or furcal
                       canals were seen obturated at the furcation area (Fig 19G).


                    2)  Follow-up
                       2-weeks – The referring dentist reported that the patient had returned to his
                                                                           #
                                    office for follow-up and that tooth  36 is stable with no gingival
                                    swelling. The dentist wanted to remove the existing core buildup
                                                                                                        #
                                    and replace it with a post and core for 36-x-38 bridge. Since  38
                                                                                                         #
                                    was mesially tipped, the author had recommended uprighting  38
                                                                                                          #
                                    prior to 36-x-38 bridge placement. Or else, a single crown for  36
                                                     #
                                    and an implant  37 would be ideal.
                       1-month – The referring dentist had sent over a follow-up radiograph of the
                                              #
                                    prepared  36 abutment with a temporary 36-x-38 bridge (Fig
                                    19H, 19I). The patient was ecstatic to have regained masticatory
                                    function on the left side in such a short period of time.

                       3-months – It was a surprise to see that the permanent bridge had been
                                    cemented. The patient reported high satisfaction with the
                                    temporary bridge and had requested that the permanent one be
                                    cemented. Radiographic examination revealed healing of the


                                                                                                           30
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37