Page 54 - The Beauty and Sorrow in Endodontics-Chapter 2
P. 54

moment and can be re-infected.

                        10-months – The patient returned with the chief complaint of a new abscess
                                                   #
                                  apical to tooth  11. Periapical radiographs showed enlarged lesion
                                  compared to the pre-op radiograph (Fig 29L, 29M). Due to the

                                  inability to schedule a time that works for the patient, a course of
                                  antibiotic (Clindamycin 300mg TID for 14 days) was prescribed to

                                  prevent the infection from spreading and the patient was asked to

                                  return for  11 apical surgery when he becomes available.
                                             #
                                                                                    #
                        2.5-years – The patient returned for apical surgery of  11.     2
                         Intrigued by the etiology of the infection, the author filtered through all
                    existing images pertaining to the case. Deep caries and coronal leakages were

                    ruled out first due to the moderate size of the restoration and lack of leakage
                                                                                      #
                    under microscopic examination (Fig 29N). Secondly, tooth  11 was
                    periodontally healthy; no calculus, recession or deep probing depths were noted,

                    therefore ruling out periodontal etiology as well (Fig 29O). Lastly, incisal
                                                  #
                    attrition was noted on both  11 and  21 prior to Invisalign treatment and the
                                                           #
                    post-Invisalign radiograph showed resorbed apex of tooth  11with apical
                                                                                     #
                    radiolucency (Fig 29P, 29Q). Therefore, it is highly suspected that patient had
                                                           #
                    sustained traumatic injury on tooth  11 either from parafunctional occlusion or
                    bruxism.
                    1
            Note   For other treatments for this patient, see “Cases 86, 94”
                                                 #
                    2  For the apical surgery of  11, see “Case 86”















                                                                                                               52
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59